=====
From exether@demo.xandmail.com:
I really like this scene. I'd love to see it in high resolution.
I had to read your description to figure out where decay was though.
The moon on the left seems strange, it seems not to be spherical a bit as if it
was post-processed.
This image would really go with 'Future' topic too.
=====
From noe.falzon@tiscali.fr:
How could I tell what I think and feel ? This is so wonderful ! Everything in
this pictures seems so good to me that I cannot say anything else than I hope
that this round will be yours ! Congratulations !

=====
From god@rajram.com:

No clue how its decay
=====
From sigmanufratguy@netscape.net:
This really does not look like a decay scene.  You can barely see the "dead
city" in the background.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
It's a nice image, but the modern colony city dominates the ruins, leaving the
connection to the topic rather thin.

=====
From panikme@yahoo.com.br:
good but with out text descrition, no a decay

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
It seems that the decay of this image is kept in the 
background. This image would probably fit better into the 
next "future" round. Overall the image is very well 
constructed, lots and lots of wonderful details, really 
great work. But as far as the topic is concerned I feel 
this one is borderline off topic.

=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

I like this image.  One of my favourite so far judging.


=====
From Knight-Graphics@earthlink.net:
I thought that the rules say you can_t use an image that you created in the
past??? I know that I saw this posted at Renderosity in early October...
October 10th to be exact. Here is the link:
"http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid
=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The modelling and textures are done well.  The clouds in 
the they skey look a bit flat to me - they seem to have 
the feel of a painting rather than being realistic.

=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Beautiful city, though to fit the topic better maybe have the
older civilization more prominent. The five cone towers are 
actually the weakest elements, too "clean;" everything else 
looks fantastic! Maybe the second aircraft should be re-positioned
or eliminated. Some of the small details are incredible; the 
glowing arches sparked my curiosity. What could it be?


=====
From file:
I really like the image. It is not very obvious where decay is at first. I had
to read your desc. Too bad you can't use the image for next topic. :-)


=====
From file:
I really like the image. It is not very obvious where decay is at first. I had
to read your desc. Too bad you can't use the image for next topic. :-)


=====
From file:
this is a really nice image, but would be MUCH improved if you could move some
ruins into the foreground. Yu have a nice little park up font, if it was
centered on an old building, it would give you great new_old contrast. As is, I
barely noticed the ruins. A great loking image anyway, but harder to see the
topic.
Notable for textures, modelling, lighting


=====
From file:
this is a really nice image, but would be MUCH improved if you could move some
ruins into the foreground. Yu have a nice little park up font, if it was
centered on an old building, it would give you great new_old contrast. As is, I
barely noticed the ruins. A great loking image anyway, but harder to see the
topic.
Notable for textures, modelling, lighting


=====
From file:
I really like this - in fact I aspire to produce scenes this good - I spend
times myself making futuristic skylines like this. But hey dude, I bet you're
kicking yourself for not entering it next round (future)! In fact, this was one
image I looked at for a long time before making my one for the next round. It
really inspired me. Nice one Rob, or TROC, or czarnyrobert, or whoever you
are.-RICH


=====
From file:
great image


=====
From file:
This is really impressive!
Notable for textures, modelling, lighting, composition


=====
From file:
cool image
Notable for composition