=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Your trees look remarkable! Great attention to details. I must say I am impressed it took your P166 only 38 minutes to render such a complex image.

=====
From mjklein00@msn.com:
impressive architecture.





=====
From Stickgod01@aol.com:
Well modelled, but the lighting could use some work. More dynamic lighting would add depth to the image.

=====
From stephenhasmail@yahoo.com:
Very fancy objects.  Nice use of macros (at least from what you've said).  There is a lot of gray in your scene.  I think this would be fixed a bit if you used a slightly yellow light source (similate sunlight a bit better).  Try to have a more clearly defined focus in your scene.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
This is a very nice, detailed scene overall.  The trees 
look good, and I like the tile pattern.  Better textures on 
some of the foreground objects (the telescope and the 
wooden objects) could make it look a little better, I 
think.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Great modelling. Lighting is a bit strange, but nice.

=====
From whitey@telefragged.com:
the rendering could have been a little cleaner

=====
From tom@tomandlu.co.uk:
Outstanding modelling.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Nice architecture. I would have liked to see more background, behind the
trees through the arch. The shadows are very odd... the chess table casts a
shadow to the right while the table at right casts a shadow to the left!
Also the shadows in the building archways and windows don't seem dark
enough. Otherwise, a well-detailed and coloured image.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: A balanced and pleasing to the eye image
Technical: Good description of some hard work.  The result shows
Theme:  It's a lab.


=====
From file:
Notable for composition