=====
From digitalburn@totalise.co.uk:
like the water and the little creature's kinda cute



=====
From elvish_archer@mailcity.com:
a funny picture u can add pokemon too

=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:
The sea monster needs serious texture work.  A crackle-based texture for scales would have helped.

=====
From pbourke@swin.edu.au:
Sea monster - I think not. Cute, colourful maybe not not attractive.

=====
From panthus@xtra.co.nz:
Clear and bright, except for the dino-monster's gritty texture. I like the light blue, circle emanation through the water from the dino-monster, it focuses the picture.

=====
From dvnss@mega.ist.utl.pt:
Some very deranged monsters

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Nice idea but need to work on realism.
=====
From douge@nls.net:
The sea monster looks more cuddly than deadly!  Very colorful.  Water could use some work, though.


=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
A better desription would be nice. There is no sense of scale. Your sea monster seems a little rough. I like your island(?) and your water is pretty decent.
=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
How long did this take after making all of those patches

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
That's stretching it a bit on the topic side.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
The crab and plant objects look good.  

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
The textures need quite a bit of work.  

=====
From went@netcourrier.com:
The textures could have been improved.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
The textures are lousy on the mother, but _visually_, it works.  I don't like cicular compositions because they are too static and non-directional, but the way the plants, reflections and creatures break up the waves brings it together.  Is the baby monster walking on water?  Actually, in physical reality, nothing works that way. . . but I don't really care either!  I really like this picture.


=====
From file:
Monster - I think not. Mishapen lizard maybe.