=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
+ I like the little glow around the metal objects, and the dripping milk is
well-made, too. 
- The faces look a bit stiff, perhaps.

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Cleo and her maidservant are extremely 'stiff' looking; also, there ought to be
some oreos with her in the bath, I mean, what good is milk without oreos? :*)
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Nice composition. Shouldn't gold be reflective?
=====
From jull43@ij.net:
If I study it, the perspective appears correct in some 
manner but at first glance it appears all wrong outside the 
"window." Was it a wide angle lens or something? 
Although the "texture" of the textures appears reasonable 
(save for too large seams in the obelisks) the colors are 
too similar for my tastes. Everything too gold/yellow, even 
the browns for the tree trunks. 

Frankly there was no reason to work Cleopatra into it. 


=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Cleopatra had a very finely drawn and small face, not the brute that you
showed. I also wonder if it is neccessary to show bare breasts in this kind of
competition.

=====
From davidwilkinson@cwcom.net:
A good try, but it is so difficult to get a realistic skin texture.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Very ambitious, quite effective.
Her breasts are better looking than her face!

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
While her chest is.. err... attractive, she looks unhappier 
as possible;
what about her nose ?

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Is this the face of the queen who seduced Julius Caesar 
and Mark Antony'?  This is a great start but I think 
Cleopatra_s face need to softened.  The milk bath came 
out very well and I like the way you did the trunks of the 
palm trees.