=====
From denny1@home.com:
The radiator is well designed, looks very real.

The TV is a bit too dark to see clearly.

The magazine splayed out on the floor is nice, but I don't think it would
have stayed with its spine that far up in the air. It would have settled
much closer to the ground.

There is a lack line tracing the floor under and around the nightstand, which
I cannot identify. Not sure what was intended.

Are two of the books on the stand floating?

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
No penalties assessed for second entry because it is so different!
=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Very interesting concept.
Poor lighting. I know this is night, but that is not good enough an excuse for
plain darkness. A picture is meant to be seen.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Great concept!

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Nice recursive idea.  Good marks for concept.

=====
From houston.graphics@iname.com:
I like the idea, the moonlight (?) reflecting off the back wall, I feel,
should have been cast over the floor as well, but thats my opinion.  Nice
picture though.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Good concept.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Fantastic concept, and fairly well executed. The "plasma" around the bubble
looks a bit solid... something more halo-ey might have looked better. But
overall nicely done.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
meaningless shapes


=====
From r@209.155.62.50:
Notable for composition, originality