=====
From denny1@home.com:
You had time to do two images for the contest? Boy, I barely got through one.

The architecture looks a bit too "perfect", no signs of wear or use, though I
suppose that criticism is better levelled at the artist of the original matte
painting.

The mechanism to get the shadow effect you wanted is extremely clever.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Dunno how to comment.

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
A pretty good reproduction of the original.  I would 
rather see a different representation, like maybe a night 
scene or a stormy day.  The sharp shadows are correct 
with now clouds in the sky.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
This is a very well done image . The thing that it lacks is 
any sign of life . Even one or two pedestrians in the 
distance would have livened it up . Paintings for films 
are usually as backgrounds for some sort of action and 
can be a bit bland without some life .

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
With a topic this wide open, why opt to slavishly imitate 
copyrighted material?

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Another lovely image. I like the grainy effect. Well done.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
Interesting but it lacks thematic unity and thematic variation at the same time.
I mean a pagoda next to a glass highrise and a highrise next to a space needle
are fine. This is just a mix of shapes. 


=====
From r@209.155.62.50:
i'd forgive correcting the shadow.