=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

It was a bit abastract and simplistic but fun to watch.   I thought the concept
of "life" was lacking a bit.
=====
From pdolan@jps.net:
Interesting world, nice movement.

=====
From lou_bruce@yahoo.com:
The modeling was too simple. The animation was pretty good. The overall artistic
theme was good. The backdrop and setting was interesting. 

=====
From vansickl@erols.com:
This animation made very little sense.


=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Text presentation and credits go a bit too fast.
The water ripples look unnatural (too simplistic), though the speed of them
looks right.
I like the revolving planet in the background, though it would have been even
better if the background of stars moved as well (possibly some other direction,
depending on the planet we are staning on).
I like your ideas about different species, there is even expression (a sigh).
I would have made love more lively after the initial hesitations.
I like the title and it's graphism (although hard to read when you haven't seen
the textual version). Nice poster.

=====
From neilryan@mtco.com:
This was very strange.  The movement
was well done, but I don't quite get
the story.