=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

This was a good animation, enjoyed it.  The atomspheric affects were good.  The
sea weed moved a bit too much in one scene.  The shark needed some work... more
naturalisic.  But a great animation.
=====
From pdolan@jps.net:
The low-polygon count on the shark makes for unpleasant sharp angles during some
of the open-mouth shots, also problems with the polygon counts on the seaweeds,
nice ship, ground textures have noticeable tiling problems

=====
From vansickl@erols.com:
The dragon was okay, but the scenery was much sparser than a real ocean
bottom, and the exploding shark was not natural-looking.


=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
It's nice to hear a sound track and in that wide silent world it brings some
welcome colour.
The interpretation is not quite to my liking, but I have to admit it does show
an important and realistic (to a point) side of life.
The first movement of the dragon's tail looks very good and convincing, but
then
wing movements and subsequent strikes of the tail do not look natural (either
for a flying or swimming animal - I know this is difficult but hey that's what
you signed for).

=====
From neilryan@mtco.com:
Nice opening.  The seaweed should be more
attached to the sea floor.  The boat was a nice
touch.  The egg should have been sealed better.
The fire effects and shark destruction could use
some work.