When dealing with univariate data you want to do one or more of
The unvariateML package has a fast and reliable functions to help you with
these tasks. The core of the package are more than 20 functions for fast
and thoroughly tested calculation of maximum likelihood estimates for univariate
models.
AIC or BIC.This vignette shows you how to use the tools of univariateML to do exploratory
data analysis.
The dataset egypt contains contains the age at death of 141 Roman era Egyptian
mummies. Our first task is to find a univariate model that fits this data.
library("univariateML")
head(egypt)
## # A tibble: 6 x 2
## age sex
## <dbl> <chr>
## 1 1.5 male
## 2 1.83 male
## 3 2 male
## 4 2 male
## 5 3 male
## 6 3 male
hist(egypt$age, main = "Mortality in Ancient Egypt", freq = FALSE)
The AIC is a handy
and easy to use model selection tool, as it only depends on the log-likelihood and
number of parameters of the models. The \code{AIC} generic in R can take multiple
models, and the lower the \code{AIC} the better.
Since all the data is positive we will only try densities support on the positive half-line.
AIC(mlbetapr(egypt$age),
mlexp(egypt$age),
mlinvgamma(egypt$age),
mlgamma(egypt$age),
mllnorm(egypt$age),
mlrayleigh(egypt$age),
mlinvgauss(egypt$age),
mlweibull(egypt$age),
mlinvweibull(egypt$age),
mllgamma(egypt$age))
## df AIC
## mlbetapr(egypt$age) 2 1312.464
## mlexp(egypt$age) 1 1249.553
## mlinvgamma(egypt$age) 2 1322.949
## mlgamma(egypt$age) 2 1234.772
## mllnorm(egypt$age) 2 1263.874
## mlrayleigh(egypt$age) 1 1260.217
## mlinvgauss(egypt$age) 2 1287.124
## mlweibull(egypt$age) 2 1230.229
## mlinvweibull(egypt$age) 2 1319.120
## mllgamma(egypt$age) 2 1314.187
The Weibull and Gamma models stand out with an AIC far below the other candidate models.
To see the parameter estimates of mlweibull(egypt$age) just print it:
mlweibull(egypt$age)
## Maximum likelihood estimates for the Weibull model
## shape scale
## 1.404 33.564
mlweibull(egypt$age) is a univariateML object. For more details about it call summary:
summary(mlweibull(egypt$age))
##
## Maximum likelihood for the Weibull model
##
## Call: mlweibull(x = egypt$age)
##
## Estimates:
## shape scale
## 1.404158 33.563564
##
## Data: egypt$age (141 obs.)
## Support: (0, Inf)
## Density: stats::dweibull
## Log-likelihood: -613.1144
Now we will investigate how the two models differ with quantile-quantile plots, or Q-Q plots for short.
qqmlplot(egypt$age, mlweibull, datax = TRUE, main = "QQ Plot for Ancient Egypt")
# Can also use qqmlplot(mlweibull(egypt$age), datax = TRUE) directly.
qqmlpoints(egypt$age, mlgamma, datax = TRUE, col = "red")
qqmlline(egypt$age, mlweibull, datax = TRUE)
qqmlline(egypt$age, mlgamma, datax = TRUE, col = "red")
The Q-Q plot shows that neither Weibull nor Gamma fits the data very well.
If you prefer P-P plots to Q-Q plots take a look at ?ppplotml instead.
Use the plot, lines and points generics to plot the densities.
hist(egypt$age, main = "Mortality in Ancient Egypt", freq = FALSE)
lines(mlweibull(egypt$age), lwd = 2, lty = 2, ylim = c(0, 0.025))
lines(mlgamma(egypt$age), lwd = 2, col = "red")
rug(egypt$age)
Now we want to get an idea about the uncertainties of our model parameters.
Do to this we can do a parametric bootstrap to calculate confidence intervals using either
bootstrapml or confint. While bootstrapml allows you to calculate any
functional of the parameters and manipulate them afterwards, confint is restricted
to the main parameters of the model.
# Calculate two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the two Gumbel parameters.
bootstrapml(mlweibull(egypt$age)) # same as confint(mlweibull(egypt$age))
## 2.5% 97.5%
## shape 1.25673 1.615228
## scale 29.66339 37.933201
bootstrapml(mlgamma(egypt$age))
## 2.5% 97.5%
## shape 1.3219804 2.05245577
## rate 0.0412586 0.06893691
These confidence intervals are not directly comparable. That is, the scale parameter in
the Weibull model is not directly comparable to the rate parameter in the gamma model.
So let us take a look at a a parameter with a familiar interpretation, namely the mean.
The mean of the Weibull distribution with parameters shape and scale is
scale*gamma(1 + 1/shape). On the other hand, the mean of the
Gamma distribution with parameters shape and rate is
shape/rate.
The probs argument can be used to modify the limits of confidence interval. Now
we will calculate two 90% confidence intervals for the mean.
# Calculate two-sided 90% confidence intervals for the mean of a Weibull.
bootstrapml(mlweibull(egypt$age),
map = function(x) x[2]*gamma(1 + 1/x[1]),
probs = c(0.05, 0.95))
## 5% 95%
## 27.46933 33.63697
# Calculate two-sided 90% confidence intervals for the mean of a Gamma.
bootstrapml(mlgamma(egypt$age),
map = function(x) x[1]/x[2],
probs = c(0.05, 0.95))
## 5% 95%
## 27.35220 34.25949
We are be interested in the quantiles of the underlying distribution, for instance the median:
# Calculate two-sided 90% confidence intervals for the two Gumbel parameters.
bootstrapml(mlweibull(egypt$age),
map = function(x) qweibull(0.5, x[1], x[2]),
probs = c(0.05, 0.95))
## 5% 95%
## 23.00303 28.98483
bootstrapml(mlgamma(egypt$age),
map = function(x) qgamma(0.5, x[1], x[2]),
probs = c(0.05, 0.95))
## 5% 95%
## 21.81333 27.65462
We can also plot the bootstrap samples.
hist(bootstrapml(mlweibull(egypt$age),
map = function(x) x[2]*gamma(1 + 1/x[1]),
reducer = identity),
main = "Bootstrap Samples of the Mean",
xlab = "x",
freq = FALSE)
The functions dml, pml, qml and rml can be used to calculate densities,
cumulative probabilities, quantiles, and generate random variables. Here are
\(10\) random observations from the most likely distribution of Egyptian mortalities given
the Weibull model.
set.seed(313)
rml(10, mlweibull(egypt$age))
## [1] 25.90552 59.64456 13.36882 44.29378 12.22563 17.66144 54.57633
## [8] 22.86824 11.48328 19.94814
Compare the empirical distribution of the random variates to the true cumulative probability.
set.seed(313)
obj = mlweibull(egypt$age)
q = seq(0, max(egypt$age), length.out = 100)
plot(q, pml(q, obj), type = "l", ylab = "Cumulative Probability")
r = rml(100, obj)
lines(ecdf(r))