Audio/Video Transport WG (avt) WEDNESDAY, March 21 at 1530-1730 THURSDAY, March 22 at 1300-1500 ================================ CHAIRS: Colin Perkins Stephen Casner AGENDA: WEDNESDAY, March 21 Introduction and status update (Casner) 10 draft-ietf-avt-dv-audio-02.txt The Secure Real Time Transport Protocol (Carrara) 15 draft-ietf-avt-srtp-00.txt RTCP Extension for Source Specific Multicast Sessions (Chesterfield) 15 draft-chesterfield-avt-rtcpssm-00.txt RTCP-based Feedback: Concepts and Message Timing Rules (Ott) 15 draft-wenger-avt-rtcp-feedback-02.txt Low Delay RTCP Feedback Format (Burmeister) 15 draft-fukunaga-low-delay-rtcp-02.txt RTP Retransmission Payload Format (Burmeister) 15 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-selret-01.txt RTP specification and audio/video profile (Casner/Perkins) 20 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-09.txt, .ps draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-10.txt, .ps draft-ietf-avt-rtp-mime-04.txt draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-bw-03.txt draft-ietf-avt-rtp-interop-07.txt draft-ietf-avt-profile-interop-05.txt THURSDAY, March 22 An RTP Payload Format for Generic FEC with ULP (Li) 15 draft-ietf-avt-ulp-00.txt RTP payload format and file storage format for AMR (Westerlund) 15 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-amr-05.txt RTP payload format for AMR-WB (Lakaniemi) 15 draft-lakaniemi-avt-amrwb-00.txt An RTP Payload Format for EVRC Speech (Li) 15 draft-ietf-avt-evrc-01.txt RTP payload format for Vorbis (Moffit) 15 draft-moffitt-vorbis-rtp-00.txt RTP Payload Format for MPEG-4 Streams (Gentric) 15 draft-gentric-avt-mpeg4-multipleSL-02.txt RTP payload format for MPEG-4 FlexMultiplexed streams (Roux) 15 draft-curet-avt-rtp-mpeg4-flexmux-00.txt We strongly encourage participants to read all relevent drafts before the meeting, and for those making presentations to assume that the audience has read the draft. Those presenting new drafts: briefly describe the basic problem and your proposed solution, discuss known issues, limitations and problems, outline where you want input from the working group, and how you wish us to proceed. When presenting work which has been previously discussed: describe the changes from the previous draft, highlight unresolved problems, propose future directions. Authors are also reminded of the contents of section 10 of RFC 2026. In particular, the requirement for disclosure of intellectual property relating to contributions.