===== From zekaric@yahoo.ca: Keep it simple. And it works in this case. Nice work. The flame actually doesn't look too bad even though it's noticeable that it's too perfect. ===== From iacopo.mochi@tele2.it: What can I say? Wonderfull idea (I had the same....:-)). The flame is really great. ===== From ian_c_thornton@hotmail.com: Stunning flame from a technical point of view but needs to be more orange. Needs some objects behind the viewer to be reflected in the ice material ... the solitary specular highlight makes the surface look more like plastic than ice. Amazing flame though. ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Nice image. The flame could use a bit more turbulation. ===== From s.day@uel.ac.uk: The flame looks good but a little too still. ===== From jgrimbert@free.fr: Where is the ice ?