===== From tek@evilsuperbrain.com: The things in the foreground look surreal, brightly coloured improbably shapes that distract from the subject matter. I think, from reading your description, they're meant to be rocks and a pond, honestly I think the image would look better without them. The animals look okay for cartoon animals, but really need better materials, the garish colours make it hard to see the shapes clearly. ===== From zekaric@yahoo.ca: Cute. Not too bad on the modelling. The splash seems to be well done. ===== From enrique.sahagun@uam.es: strange image but beautiful anyway ===== From p.gibellini@teinos.com: I like the scene and the textures. Deers are nice, panther improvable. ===== From nargy@yahoo.com: I must admit I really like the style of the picture. It almost looks like some modern painting. May be that is sur-renderism! ===== From diegocg@quipo.it: Good image, specially for composition. I like the blue panther, only the rear legs seems to me a little less elegant than the front ones. Grass on the background could be more thick, and deer's antlers and water on foreground could be more smoothed. Have great fun with Blender! ===== From glenn@mccarters.net: A cartoonish look is difficult to pull off without it looking = amateurish. It needs to have a "consistently unrealistic" look, with = every element being some twisted analog of reality. In this case, I = think your mushrooms, grasses, birds, and sky are too realistic compared = to the cartoony rocks, water, deer, and panther. It's clear that you put quite a lot of effort into this image. Great = dynamics and emotion! Good sense of movement with the tilted camera = viewpoint and the deer running out of the frame and the splashing water. = But there's something about the panther's motion blur that strikes me = as wrong -- the blur is the same length everywhere and all parallel to = the ground, making it look like the cat was shot out of a canon rather = than pouncing.