===== From douge@nls.net: Frightening. ===== From i-mcnamara@cornellcollege.edu: Sigh... I almost guilty about it, but I laughed at your text file, so I'm giving you a reasonable score for concept and originality. Good modeling, texturing and lighting. For the hell of it you should re-render this scene with radiosity turned on, maybe at a higher resolution. Of course, if you did that, would the picture be a collection of pixels or a picture of just one? ===== From am3n_r3@yahoo.com.au: Ultra minimalist 1x1 by the looks of it?? ===== From m-abel@columbus.rr.com: "Rendered useless" might have been a better name. ===== From sshelby@shelbyvision.com: Nice B.S. Are you in advertising? ;-}> Actually, it does represent = something: a pixel. If it were actually a pixel, it would be much = smaller.