===== From exether@demo.xandmail.com: Nice image. Missing some focal blur to be more realistic, I don't think you could have both first plane rocks and mountain in focus with a camera or your eyes. ===== From noe.falzon@tiscali.fr: Superb ! I always liked mixes with nature and stone ! This one is very intersting, I think. ===== From god@rajram.com: I don't understand the relevance of this. There is no decay, and you don't specify why. ===== From rgow@lanset.com: Nice image! Great texture on the mountain & good job on the vegetation. Sky looks good at top but seems like too much white lower down. ===== From hildurka@simnet.is: In a way I like this image but at the same time there are many aspects I donīt like. The arch looks great, but I donīt feel the background belongs there. I think itīs the snow is thatīs bothering me, it doesnīt belong together with the spring green leaves on the left. Also the sky is way too bright, considering that the light is coming from the opposite direction. The modeling of the arch is excellent, also the rocks. The overall composition is too tight, you should have moved the camera further away to show the ground leading to the arch as well to give the arch a bit more "breathing space" in the image. ===== From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com: The image is ok but perhaps next time you could explain a little more. Maybe it is time to start doing the write-up earlier. ===== From Knight-Graphics@earthlink.net: Beautiful. Continue to push the limits of your imagination (and your computer). ===== From file: I like the modelling, the mountains. HTe leaves are somehow off; I think the texture is a little too smooth, bright. Overall, a nice effect though. Notable for modelling ===== From file: Notable for modelling ===== From file: Notable for modelling ===== From file: Good idea - it makes a change from the strangely large number of daft skeletons that appear to have come this round.