===== From rgow@lanset.com: Damn, that looks great! Good modelling, lighting. Dirt seems kind of bright. ===== From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com: A very nice and detailed entry. Impressive. I'm glad you mentioned that you intended it to look the way it was at its prime. ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Obviously a lot of detail here but the image tends to deemphasize that. Perhaps a closer position with the camera may have helped. The more I look at it the better it gets but first glance doesn't bring that out. Liked the grundge along the bottom. Perhaps a more dramatic lighting technique would have made the image pop out. ===== From hildurka@simnet.is: This is very good for a first timer on the IRTC. Your building is amazing detailed. The modelling is great. The only problem I can see is with the light, the facade gets way too bright so the textures and the details tend to dissappear. Try different placements of the main light, remember, shadows give depth to the facade, and also different placements for the camera. Also, look into the radiosity settings (see Pov manual) I look forward to see your next submission. Great work! ===== From jjaguar@worldnet.att.net: The modeling work is very good. I hope to see more of your work in the IRTC in the future! ===== From chris_hormann@gmx.de: Nice work. The technique for the background mountains is a neat idea. The path in the foreground could use some more structure.