===== From charliemc@prodigy.net: Nice stuff. ===== From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au: Very Dali-esque in style, with an interesting composition. Metal textures are very impressive. I'm not sure about the hard shadows, artistically, but you're right in that they add to the contrast in the scene. I like the light on the ground and the two objects in the background to give the image some depth. ===== From hgregory3@aol.com: Artistic - Pleasing to the eye. Nice. Concept - A different sort of contrast. ===== From steve@neurotrain.com: A 13 T 15 C 9 The picture is well framed and I would like the lighting better if there weren't shadows. The two objects in the background is unnecessary and are distracting. Techincal: Even on an alien landscape anything prouting out of the ground would cause a crack, disruption of mound of some sort. I just don't see the contrast... ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: I like the shaping on the objects. Nice metal textures. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Surprisingly effective. I think you achieved exactly what you were aiming for. ===== From hfventer@ing.sun.ac.za: The contrast of metal and organic forms is not that pronounced, since we have lots of organic looking metal things in every day life. Adding angular natural materials would have brought the point home. ===== From fabien.mosen@skynet.be: Nice shapes, overall, though I'm not convinced by the lighting (a little hard and confusing) ===== From file: I can't understand why someone would like to enter the same image two times in the same competition, specially when that competition allows only original entries made specifically for the current round. You clearly sent this image again intentionally, bcos I see you have slighty modified the original txt submitted to "IMAGINARY WORLDS". jaime@ctav.es