===== From ekaiser@camden.tds.net: very cool good job ===== From whhale@nvl.army.mil: Nor old looking ===== From agage@csee.usf.edu: Nice tree and grass, interesting image overall. ===== From english@spiritone.com: Looks alien,but far too clean. ===== From ddombrow@vt.edu: Everything seems a little too static and perfectly arranged. Needs some randomness. Nice Concept though. ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: Your aliens are fancy. But is it really on topic ? Close enough, but not quite in my eyes. I like the grass. There is no gamma correction rule that I know of in the IRTC. ===== From jouni@mikrobitti.fi: Nice aliens, but unfortunately fairly unconnected with the original topic. "Definitely it is an old sculpture", right? Why does it shine like a PVC miniskirt in the sun? The tree is fine, but the grass IMHO should be more dense, especially if the blades are that long. Too many green objects, too. Looking forward to your next entry, as you've clearly got some point in this one. Let's hope you won't go astray next time :-) ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: Imaginative and pretty cool-looking... given the amount of shine on the statue, though, it doesn't really come across as "old and forgotten", I don't think. Still, I like this picture a lot. ===== From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk: nice marbel texture.