===== From ekaiser@camden.tds.net: pretty, I would've liked deeper colors, though. ===== From jgrimbert@atos-group.com: Very original, but maybe too much for common definition of the theme. Should the random generator be considered as an Artist ? ===== From chris@bluelectrode.com: Nice try on the interpretation, and good work with the macros, but it just doesn't work for me. An abstract could easily fit into any round and doesn't prove indepth thought over conception. ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: Nice surrealistic image but it lacks the ruins concept. ===== From taymac@peaknet.net: great color and compositional balance,wonderful whimsical feel to the work ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: It is a very artistic submission but reaching the topic is a bit stretchy. ===== From jouni@mikrobitti.fi: You're fiddling well with the some of the best tricks in computer-based graphics. I'll punch your score because this is - IMO - pushing the theme too far into the abstract direction. Sorry! ===== From StephenF@whoever.com: Cool-looking, definitely, and very artistic, with a good use of color. ===== From c.bunker@plymouth.ac.uk: alittle more explanation might be nice . ===== From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au: Artistically very beautiful, but even on another plane I don't see how this represents ruins, except in some totally abstract way. ===== From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk: Nice abstract image but off topic.