===== From caleb@chemeng.uct.ac.za: check out anti-aliasing - will do wonders for this picture ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: It seems like you put a lot of effort into it, but the image is incomprehensible to me. Sorry. ===== From djconnel@flash.net: There's a lot of good things going on in this image... however, there is also major room for improvement. * It needs antialiasing * It is too dark * Much of the scene (like the green material) is confusingly textured This has enormous potential. It really is a striking scene, and Nar is exceptionally well represented. It just needs a little more attention to the details. ===== From east103@dialaccess.com: Nice job with the wings. ===== From rohde@xmailer.informatik.uni-bonn.de: The idea for this picture is great; If I were the person in charge, this would certainly be my "honorable mention"! I would love to sea the inverse version from the real worlds' point of view. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: This is a hard one to comment on. The idea is very original but the image is a bit hard to interpret. ===== From clem@dhol.com: The two way image is a clever idea and, except for the very unrealistic fire, the modelling and textures are very good. ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Very strange story. So the pic is also strange, not very "ovbious", but interesting when you see it during a while, after reading your writting. ===== From r@www-cache-atm.informatik.uni-bonn.de: In an earlier comment, I wrote that I would give your picture a honorable mention for the idea. What I meant to say that this would be the least I would give it. Some other pictures (for example the frog/apple, which redefines "photorealistic") had a nicer look in terms of clarity and colors, but yours has been my #1 vote because of the great idea. Notable for originality, composition