===== From manorton@tcnet.net: Is it realy nesecary to have the woman in the scene? ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: Not offended, but I think the image would have been better without the gravity-defying nudes. Very nice job on the slug; the water and tatched roof are also very good, as are the lights inside (or beyond?) the homes. The boards in the walls are a bit too regular.. Very good job greening up the lower parts of the metal stands. The fountains? or grass? shooting up out of the water need more fluidity (if fountains). ===== From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com: Neat idea, although I didn't know they were slugs at first. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Nudity is quite tasteful. A Poser figure with HAIR???!?!?! That raises you some points. Totally cool and bizarre scene. ===== From tlyons@gnn.com: too dark, try viewing on an other computer after rendering (like haveing somone else read your document before printing) ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: The left house seems to be burning out with a bright fire. What did you use motion blur for? The water is far too strongly colores. At the few centimetres that cover the front of the creature it should be completely clear. Where is the "swimming girl"? ===== From Varyk@aol.com: Happy naked natives. Sign me up for a ticket ;) ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Not bad. Some good details and textures. I like the thin rope the surfer is holding. ===== From chipr@niestu.com: Intriguing concept. ===== From r@tk156239.telekabel.at: A very good image, nice textures, (nice models ;) ,...