===== From agage@csee.usf.edu: Very nice! Trees are maybe a little to regular, but the placement is good. ===== From manorton@tcnet.net: DUDE, this is GREAT :) MANorton ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: You are right, the water is definitely something to be proud of! The rest of the image isn't too shabby either! About the only thing I can see that could possibly use some improvement is that the trees seem to look awfully similar in shape. ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: This one looks good, the effects of daylight shining on and into the water are very good. Unlike many other entries this round this really looks like water :) ===== From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu: Nice architectural rendering. ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Water is very real. Lighting very nice. And it's a rich swimming pool, sure. ===== From djohnston@iname.com: Very nice lighting, but with all the white and reflective surfaces, things are very bright. The water is also very nice, but I would have really enjoyed getting a chance to see the sculpure in the middle. Oh well. :) ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Fine, light, airy image. It has a neo-classical look that I like a lot. Well done. The inside water is quite good, particularly in its contrast to the sea outside. Wish I could see more of the sculpture... ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: The architecture and lighting are quite striking. The water is ver realistic. A very attractive image. ===== From chipr@niestu.com: Radiance, wow! I've used it, but never for anything this complex. I always knew it could do great things, and this image proves it. Beautiful modeling, texturing, composition. The colors are a little skimpy, but not bad. The water is especially good. Quite realistic. ===== From r@dialup-78-168.infoserv.net: Goow work! This image invites me to take a swim... looks really good! Notable for modelling, lighting