===== From scooby@pld.com: Technically impressive. ===== From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com: I like this one better than the other one. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Boring design made worse by having to see same thing twice. ===== From gmol@my-dejanews.com: Enough with the polyhedra already! ===== From guilhem.christol@hol.fr: The topic is also ELEMENTS !!! ===== From bobfranke@halcyon.com: I have nothing against multiple entries but please don't just repeat the same theme and objects in the future. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Too bright colors on the background elements make the image look slightly cartoonish. Very nice features on the desk. ===== From arcana@sinbad.net: I would have really liked to have seen an explanation as to how you perceived this to fit in with the topic of Elements. ===== From djconnel@flash.net: I think this is a bit better than 4ens1. The use of color is better (the red and blue clash somewhat -- this is more subtle). Still, the other elements are the same, so see comments associated with that image. You need to mention how you did the furnature. If you did it yourself, nice job! If you included it from a source, though, you must note that. I looked at the source, though, and it looks like you did it yourself. ===== From bill@apocalypse.org: The object are very neat, but the rest of the scene is dull - I would have preferred the objects simply by themselves or in a more interesting environment. ===== From r@dt027n86.maine.rr.com: The idea is there and the geometrics are notible, however I would have liked to have seen a litte more texture in the background. Notable for modelling, originality ===== From r@dial-up46.webbernet.net: See comment for "Four Polyhedra". Multiple entries don't bother me at all, but they should generally have different subjects, not just be minor variations of the same image. This comment by clem@dhol.com.