===== From castlewrks@aol.com: And? 3-d always want's more detail. Good start. ===== From agage@mines.edu: A bit simple for having used that many tools. The textures seem a little flat, and most of the image is sky and water. The effect of the light on the water is very nice, though. ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: I like the water a lot, but some extra details on the other objects would have been nice. ===== From dormammu@erols.com: An average picture, not great but also not horrible. You definately have some potential. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: The image certainly reflects the topic of Night, but apart from that is rather empty. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Nice serene situation, but the bright spot on the far right creates a heavy imbalance: composition needs something on the left side. The lantern is causing tremendous glare on the water, but the lantern itself seems quite dim. ===== From djconnel@flash.net: The concept is good, but there are a few rooms for improvement: * there is clear color discretization on the water -- increase compression Q-factor, perhaps. * the boat and oars exhibit clear artifacts -- try using solid modeling instead of height fields. See other examples of boats in the IRTC past rounds. ===== From r@touchet.rl.gov: Nice lighting! I think the coolest thing about your image is its extremely effective use of open spaces to create depth. Nice job! Notable for composition, originality, lighting ===== From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net: The sky and water are very nice, but the modelling of the objects is substandard. The lamp isn't nearly bright enough for the amount of light it seems to cast. No story. This comment by clem@dhol.com.