===== From cmorack@relex.com: Dull. ===== From castlewrks@aol.com: What? No teeth? ===== From agage@mines.edu: The eyes are well done, but the clock could stand a bit more texturing. ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: Maybe it would have been better if the eyes would have been different? ===== From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu: Well hey, I'm bothered too. Anyone else? :) ===== From tlyons@gnn.com: I think you captured the target feeling.... ===== From dormammu@erols.com: Very unusual. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: This image certainly bothers us too! ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Strange juxtaposition between symmetry (clock, and eyeball orientation), and randomness (eyeball positions). ===== From djconnel@flash.net: Excellent idea!!! This one has huge potential. Unfortunately, the simplicity of the wall and clock support and the table texture hold this one back a bit. But it has the potential to be a real winner. ===== From cfusner@enter.net: Great interpetation on insomnia. It would keep me up at night, worrying that those floating eyes would come out of my clock! :) ===== From peter@table76.demon.co.uk: I particularly liked the eyes. ===== From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net: Very marginally on topic. The marble eye texture is a cliche and not a very realistic one at that. The clock body is way too flat and undetailed. The concept is scattered and not convincing. The floating eyeball bit is way overused. No background. This comment by clem@dhol.com.