===== From jknepley@nyx.net: You did a great job of making this look like more that just a scene. ===== From djconnel@flash.net: Impressive!!! I like the use of the ray-tracer to generate what is clearly hand-generated artwork.... the neo-retro aspect is also cleverly executed. ===== From castlewrks@aol.com: First impression was how you could get a fisheye view of the city and combine it with a regular view of the plaques... after downloading the source, it became apparent that you rendered the city and combined it in a second render to obtain the final product... none of which is discussed in your text file. Very unique idea and process. ===== From sonya_roberts@geocities.com: Cool. Looks very much like a magazine illustration from the '50s. I wonder if the "mile high" will ever in fact be built... ===== From daves@wkpowerlink.com: The amount of work you put into this image really shows. ===== From chipr@niestu.com: Good concept, modeling, composition. Work on the textures. The "plaque" format worked well once I understood what I was looking at. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Creative and stylish. And all raytraced! Hats off to you. ===== From wozzeck@club-internet.fr: I have mixed feelings with this one. I really like the way the overall picture looks, but much less the really rendered city. And I think it must be much better with a higher resolution, since texts are difficult to read here. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Professional looking plaque. Not really an achievement, more a dream. ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: Really nice one! ===== From peter@table76.demon.co.uk: Involved image! Very impressive. (It looks as though you're trying to show a previous entrant that you can produce images like this within the rules.) ===== From r@cust160.webbernet.net>: Clever idea, well realized. The lettering and layout have a fitting archaic feel. What would such a building do to the already odd weather patterns in Chicago? ===== From r@sharry.demon.co.uk: Notable for originality, composition, textures