===== From chipr@niestu.com: Cute idea, execution is a bit "plastic". Seems almost an afterthought when compared to your cathedral scene. ===== From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca: Migawd, how do you do it Nathan? TWO images in one competition that I think are worth 20-20-20...lovely image. ===== From tholal@bga.com: The grass and flowers look a little stiff but the ants and marbles are very well done ===== From bill.marrs@pureatria.com: Nathan, where do you find the time to create so many marvelously detailed images!? ===== From 93semeno@scar.utoronto.ca: This one is much better than the cathedral. It's more interesting. ===== From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu: Good job. Humor is so needed in this competition. Thanks. I was about to die from boredom looking at all of the bottles and glasses. ===== From usmitc04@mcl.ucsb.edu: KILL THE ANTS!!!!!!! ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: Flowers and grass seem too stiff, artificial and regular. ===== From uvasst00@mcl.ucsb.edu: Great concept, I love the great sense of motion in the flying marble and in the ants. ===== From lpurple@netcom.com: Very lively and original. One tiny nitpick: the ants and dirt texture in the foreground are very good; but the perfectly straight and vertical grass + flowers in the bg. is kinda distracting. The depth blur helps, but randomly oriented curved blades would've been better. (lathe objects maybe? torus segments?) ===== From dick@buckosoft.com: nice concept. From web_user@tonyv.aztec.co.za: Hopefully not too many ants were injured during the modelling. Notable for originality