===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: This was a good animation, enjoyed it. The atomspheric affects were good. The sea weed moved a bit too much in one scene. The shark needed some work... more naturalisic. But a great animation. ===== From pdolan@jps.net: The low-polygon count on the shark makes for unpleasant sharp angles during some of the open-mouth shots, also problems with the polygon counts on the seaweeds, nice ship, ground textures have noticeable tiling problems ===== From vansickl@erols.com: The dragon was okay, but the scenery was much sparser than a real ocean bottom, and the exploding shark was not natural-looking. ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: It's nice to hear a sound track and in that wide silent world it brings some welcome colour. The interpretation is not quite to my liking, but I have to admit it does show an important and realistic (to a point) side of life. The first movement of the dragon's tail looks very good and convincing, but then wing movements and subsequent strikes of the tail do not look natural (either for a flying or swimming animal - I know this is difficult but hey that's what you signed for). ===== From neilryan@mtco.com: Nice opening. The seaweed should be more attached to the sea floor. The boat was a nice touch. The egg should have been sealed better. The fire effects and shark destruction could use some work.